The Case for a Federal Corporate Charter Revocation Penalty
Kyle Noonan · February 2012 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 602 (2012) Though American corporations are creations of state law, the federal government predominantly regulates their behavior. This mismatch helps explain both the inadequate deterrence that the current system of criminal sanctions imposes on corporations as well as the unmet social need for retribution. This... Read More
A Patently Public Concern: Using Public Nuisance Law to Fix the False Patent Marking Statute After the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
Richard A. Crudo · February 2012 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 568 (2012) The year 2010 was marked by an explosion of lawsuits from enterprising patent attorneys seeking to take advantage of the now-superseded false patent marking statute, which proscribed marking one’s product with a patent number when no patent existed. The statute’s qui tam... Read More
The Paradox of McDonald v. City of Chicago
David S. Cohen · November 2010 79 GEO. WASH. L. REV. ARGUENDO (2010) On the last day of its 2010 Term, the Supreme Court issued the landmark decision of McDonald v. City of Chicago, holding that the Second Amendment is incorporated against state and local governments. On its face, the 5–4 decision is simple enough,... Read More
The Impacts of McIntyre on Minimum Contacts
Alan B. Morrison · September 2011 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. ARGUENDO (2011) The Supreme Court’s June 2011 decision in J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro seriously unsettles the law of personal jurisdiction in suits against manufacturers of dangerous products that are delivered, through a distributor, to the jurisdiction where the product harmed a person... Read More
The Timing of Minimum Contacts After Goodyear and McIntyre
Todd David Peterson · September 2011 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. ARGUENDO (2011) The Supreme Court has never articulated a reason why the “minimum contacts” test, which determines whether a defendant’s contacts with a forum are sufficient to subject it to in personam jurisdiction there, is required by the Due Process Clause, or why the Due Process... Read More
Volume 80, Issue 2 in Print
We are pleased to announce that the second issue of Volume 80 is now out in print. The lead piece for Issue 2 is “Direct (Anti-)Democracy,” by Professor Maxwell Stearns. This Article develops the complex argument that democratic decisionmaking embraces a set of tradeoffs based on the process used, ranging from legislative representation to appellate... Read More
Policing the Police: Freedom of the Press, the Right to Privacy, and Civilian Recordings of Police Activity
Marianne F. Kies · November 2011 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 274 (2011) In recent years, the proliferation of miniature recording devices and free video-sharing websites has led to a dramatic increase in citizen journalism. The effect of this development is clearest in the context of civilian recordings of police activity, particularly in instances of... Read More
Don’t Let Them Bite: Defining the Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants in the Event of a Bedbug Infestation
Samuel R. Gilbert · November 2011 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 243 (2011) Bedbug infestations are becoming a national crisis. The bugs are difficult to detect and inflict psychological, physical, and financial harm on their human victims. Infestations can quickly grow and spread to new areas, especially in the multiunit apartment setting. The common law... Read More
The Timing of Minimum Contacts After Goodyear and McIntyre
Todd David Peterson · November 2011 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 202 (2011) The Supreme Court has never articulated a reason why the “minimum contacts” test, which determines whether a defendant’s contacts with a forum are sufficient to subject it to in personam jurisdiction there, is required by the Due Process Clause, or why the... Read More
Naming Baby: The Constitutional Dimensions of Parental Naming Rights
Carlton F.W. Larson · November 2011 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 159 (2011) This Article provides the first comprehensive legal analysis of parents’ rights to name their own children. Currently, state laws restrict parental naming rights in a number of ways, from restrictions on particular surnames, to restrictions on diacritical marks, to prohibitions on obscenities,... Read More