The Case for a Federal Corporate Charter Revocation Penalty

Kyle Noonan · February 2012 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 602 (2012) Though American corporations are creations of state law, the federal government predominantly regulates their behavior. This mismatch helps explain both the inadequate deterrence that the current system of criminal sanctions imposes on corporations as well as the unmet social need for retribution. This...
Read More

A Patently Public Concern: Using Public Nuisance Law to Fix the False Patent Marking Statute After the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act

Richard A. Crudo · February 2012 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 568 (2012) The year 2010 was marked by an explosion of lawsuits from enterprising patent attorneys seeking to take advantage of the now-superseded false patent marking statute, which proscribed marking one’s product with a patent number when no patent existed. The statute’s qui tam...
Read More

The Paradox of McDonald v. City of Chicago

David S. Cohen · November 2010 79 GEO. WASH. L. REV. ARGUENDO (2010) On the last day of its 2010 Term, the Supreme Court issued the landmark decision of McDonald v. City of Chicago, holding that the Second Amendment is incorporated against state and local governments.  On its face, the 5–4 decision is simple enough,...
Read More

The Impacts of McIntyre on Minimum Contacts

Alan B. Morrison · September 2011 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. ARGUENDO (2011) The Supreme Court’s June 2011 decision in J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro seriously unsettles the law of personal jurisdiction in suits against manufacturers of dangerous products that are delivered, through a distributor, to the jurisdiction where the product harmed a person...
Read More

The Timing of Minimum Contacts After Goodyear and McIntyre

Todd David Peterson · September 2011 80 GEO. WASH. L. REV. ARGUENDO (2011) The Supreme Court has never articulated a reason why the “minimum contacts” test, which determines whether a defendant’s contacts with a forum are sufficient to subject it to in personam jurisdiction there, is required by the Due Process Clause, or why the Due Process...
Read More

Volume 80, Issue 2 in Print

We are pleased to announce that the second issue of Volume 80 is now out in print. The lead piece for Issue 2 is “Direct (Anti-)Democracy,” by Professor Maxwell Stearns. This Article develops the complex argument that democratic decisionmaking embraces a set of tradeoffs based on the process used, ranging from legislative representation to appellate...
Read More