Judicial Amendment of Statutes

Eric Fish 84 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 563 When courts engage in judicial review they do not merely invalidate or “strike down” unconstitutional statutes. Instead, they rewrite such statutes in order to make them constitutionally valid. They can do this in a variety of ways—by deleting words from a statute, adding words to a statute,...
Read More

Foster v. Chatman: E-Racing the White Jury’s Constitutional Veneer

Foster v. Chatman, 578 U.S. ___ (2016) (Roberts, C.J.). Response by Phyllis Goldfarb Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (Oct. Term 2015) Slip Opinion | New York Times | SCOTUSblog E-Racing the White Jury’s Constitutional Veneer When Stephen Bright, a well-known capital defense attorney, began his oral argument before the Supreme Court in Foster v....
Read More

Ocasio v. United States: The Contortionist Extortionist

Ocasio v. United States, 578 U.S. ___ (2016) (Alito, J.). Response by Professor Randall D. Eliason Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (Oct. Term 2015) Slip Opinion | New York Times | SCOTUSblog   The Contortionist Extortionist In criminal law, we ordinarily think of perpetrator and victim as two distinct entities. It would be nonsensical,...
Read More

On the Docket’s Preview of April Supreme Court Arguments

The Supreme Court’s decisions often create wide-ranging precedent that affects many people, and it is easy to forget that the cases involve individuals who personally have a lot at stake in the case’s outcome, regardless of the case’s broader impact. This month’s cases bring the personal aspect of Supreme Court cases back into focus. Many of...
Read More