Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo: Chevron is Dead; Long Live Skidmore

Professor Pierce discusses the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturns the Chevron deference doctrine. The ruling shifts the emphasis to independent judicial interpretation of statutes, moving away from automatic deference to agency interpretations. This change aligns with the principles of Skidmore v. Swift & Co., promoting a more nuanced approach to judicial review while still respecting agency expertise.

Helpful Industry or Officious Intermeddlers: Assessing U.S. Champerty Law Through the Lens of Third-Party Funding in International Dispute Resolution

Josef Wolfgang Paulson 92 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 725 International commercial arbitration is experiencing a period of rapid growth as a means of dispute resolution. As arbitration can be an expensive process, there has also been a growth in the practice of third-party funding for arbitration. The old British common law doctrines of maintenance and champerty,...
Read More

The New Usury: The Ability-to-Repay Revolution in Consumer Finance

Adam J. Levitin 92 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 425 American consumer credit regulation is in the midst of a doctrinal revolution. Usury laws, for centuries the mainstay of consumer credit regulation, have been repealed, preempted, or otherwise undermined. At the same time, changes in the structure of the consumer credit marketplace have weakened the traditional alignment...
Read More

Modernizing the Power of the Purse Statutes

Eloise Pasachoff 92 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 359 Two foundational statutes limit the executive branch’s important and necessary work in executing the budget against the backdrop of congressional control: the Antideficiency Act, dating back to the post-Civil War era, and the Impoundment Control Act, which emerged from the Nixon years. This Article, originally written as an...
Read More