Unconstitutional Appointment of Patent Death Squad

June 29, 2021 United States v. Arthrex Inc., 594 U.S. __ (2021) (Roberts, C.J.) Response by Jasper L. Tran Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (Oct. Term 2020) Slip Opinion | SCOTUSblog Unconstitutional Appointment of Patent Death Squad Can legal scholarship change the law?1 Apparently so—a recent exemplar appears in United States v. Arthrex,...
Read More

A Gatekeeper Approach to Product Liability for Amazon

Austin Martin 89 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 768 Amazon has revolutionized consumer shopping by providing a marketplace platform that connects consumers to third-party producers selling millions of products. Amazon reaps tremendous financial benefits from the sale of third-party products over its platform but incurs very little responsibility when defective third-party products harm consumers. In recent...
Read More

Risky Education

Osamudia James 89 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 667 Inequality in American education is not only about race and class. Rather, it is also about risk: the systematic way in which parents and caregivers deal with the hazards and insecurities induced and introduced by the state’s abdication of responsibility for public education, particularly against a backdrop...
Read More

War Powers Abrogation

Jeffrey M. Hirsch 89 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 593 The United States’ peacetime security is based entirely on its all-volunteer armed forces. These volunteers, split equally between full- and part-time servicemembers, risk not only their health and safety, but also their economic stability when they are called away from home for training or active duty....
Read More

A Car, A Contract… Or An Indictment?

May 25, 2021 Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 593 U.S. ___ (2021) (Gorsuch, J.). Response by Ana Corina “Cori” Alonso-Yoder Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (Oct. Term 2020) Slip Opinion | SCOTUSblog A Car, A Contract… Or An Indictment? Conservatives split on the meaning of deportation documents in Niz-Chavez v. Garland In 1996, Congress passed...
Read More

Modeling Narrowest Grounds

Maxwell Stearns 89 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 461 The Supreme Court’s doctrinal statements governing nonmajority opinions demonstrate inconsistencies and confusion belied by the Justices’ behaviors modeling the narrowest grounds doctrine. And yet, lower courts are bound by stated doctrine, beginning with Marks v. United States, not rules of construction inferred from judicial conduct. This Article...
Read More