“De facto Sovereignty”: Boumediene and Beyond

Anthony J. Colangelo · April 2009 77 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 623 (2009) This Article interrogates a particular aspect of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Boumediene v. Bush, and, until now, largely unexamined piece of the habeas puzzle: the concept of “de facto sovereignty.” I will examine what it is, explain how the Court used...
Read More

The Partially Prudential Doctrine of Mootness

Matthew I. Hall · April 2009 77 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 562 (2009) The law of mootness lacks a coherent theoretical foundation. On the one hand, mootness has been regarded—at least since 1964—as a limitation on federal court jurisdiction, mandated by Article III of the United States Constitution. Under this account, because mootness is a...
Read More

Factual Premises of Statutory Interpretation in Agency Review Cases

Todd S. Aagaard · February 2009 77 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 366 (2009) This Article examines factual premises of statutory interpretation in cases reviewing administrative agency action. It proposes an approach that would better integrate the treatment of such factual premises into the overall structure of administrative law. Judicial interpretation of statutes administered by agencies...
Read More

Universal De Novo Review

Chad M. Oldfather · February 2009 77 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 308 (2009) This Article’s aim is to enhance our understanding of the practice of de novo review, with special emphasis on four subsidiary questions. First, how might the practice of de novo review be justified? Does institutional competence provide the answer, or must we...
Read More